Patronising, Condescending and Out of Touch

Scott,
 
Reading Jim Chalmers’ last week set my teeth grinding, but what really made my blood boil and shoot flames from my ears was his answer to Emma about rent rises.
 
Jim’s suggestion that she “report excessive increases to a relevant state body” shows just how safe he is in his house, and that he doesn’t have to worry about landlords. We all know that we can “report excessive rent rises” but we also know that landlords find loopholes to exploit (like “we’re doing maintenance on the property” or “we’re selling and you have to leave”) and then relist it at a much higher rent a short time later. Our landlord did this to us to the tune of $80 a week after we’d been living there for four years (making minimal maintenance requests and always being a month in advance with the rent).
 
Jimbo blithely says the “government is trying to bring in tax breaks to get more rental properties built”. That’s not helpful, Jim, that’s patronising and condescending and shows how elitist and out of touch you are. People need real help right now.
 
Dana
 
Hi Dana,

This week I got a window into what it’s like to be Jim Chalmers (or any politician for that sake) – and I did not like it one bit! My inbox exploded with angry readers … and it was the renters were really up in arms.

I agree with you: I don’t think Jim understands what it’s like to be a renter on a low income right now.
 
Then again, to be honest, neither do I.
 
The housing market is fundamentally broken in this country, and it has been for years. Jim is smart enough to know that there are no short-term magical fixes: any steps to ‘protect’ renters can either be sidestepped (as you point out) or can result in landlords jacking up their rents to compensate.

Scott